Comments on: Push E-mail with IMAP http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2007/12/01/push-e-mail-with-imap From the mind of Philip Sun, 28 Aug 2011 12:59:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5 By: Bob http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2007/12/01/push-e-mail-with-imap#comment-496 Bob Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:50:51 +0000 http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2007/12/01/push-e-mail-with-imap#comment-496 Thanks for these examples. They helped me in making a mini-imap interface I was working on. :) Thanks for these examples. They helped me in making a mini-imap interface I was working on. :)

]]> By: pvanhoof http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2007/12/01/push-e-mail-with-imap#comment-494 pvanhoof Sun, 02 Dec 2007 11:25:09 +0000 http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2007/12/01/push-e-mail-with-imap#comment-494 That would be possible to cope with efficiently Ingo. You can use QRESYNC to quickly reconnect and resynchronize the folder as a response on such an SMS. With the right formatting (for example sending the folder name and the HIGHESTMODSEQ number and some other fields perhaps) could the SMS help a lot with that too. That would be possible to cope with efficiently Ingo. You can use QRESYNC to quickly reconnect and resynchronize the folder as a response on such an SMS. With the right formatting (for example sending the folder name and the HIGHESTMODSEQ number and some other fields perhaps) could the SMS help a lot with that too.

]]> By: Ingo http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2007/12/01/push-e-mail-with-imap#comment-495 Ingo Sat, 01 Dec 2007 15:02:04 +0000 http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2007/12/01/push-e-mail-with-imap#comment-495 Thanks for the nice explanation, this kind of stuff is not immediately obvious from the specs ;-) One thing with regard to timeouts: I would guess that carries will introduce longer timeouts only when it doesn't cost them, in other words, not for all cases. What could an IMAP-based solution do for that case, short of sending SMSes? Thanks for the nice explanation, this kind of stuff is not immediately obvious from the specs ;-)

One thing with regard to timeouts: I would guess that carries will introduce longer timeouts only when it doesn’t cost them, in other words, not for all cases. What could an IMAP-based solution do for that case, short of sending SMSes?

]]>