<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nonetheless, there&#8217;s something I don&#8217;t like about the architecture of Evolution Data Server.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/03/19/nonetheless-theres-something-i-dont-like-about-the-architecture-of-evolution-data-server/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/03/19/nonetheless-theres-something-i-dont-like-about-the-architecture-of-evolution-data-server</link>
	<description>From the mind of Philip</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 15:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: pvanhoof</title>
		<link>http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/03/19/nonetheless-theres-something-i-dont-like-about-the-architecture-of-evolution-data-server#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>pvanhoof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/03/19/nonetheless-theres-something-i-dont-like-about-the-architecture-of-evolution-data-server#comment-581</guid>
		<description>I would indeed not care whether this would be made available by EDS, Akonadi, WhooNewThing.

I would care about having to learn and target only one D-BUS API, though.

Whoever makes this thing possible, should IMO consider the possibility that other people want to put your D-BUS facade in front for their product, too.

IMHO we have plenty of overlapping technologies with different API sets already. No need to create yet another such situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would indeed not care whether this would be made available by EDS, Akonadi, WhooNewThing.</p>
<p>I would care about having to learn and target only one D-BUS API, though.</p>
<p>Whoever makes this thing possible, should IMO consider the possibility that other people want to put your D-BUS facade in front for their product, too.</p>
<p>IMHO we have plenty of overlapping technologies with different API sets already. No need to create yet another such situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/03/19/nonetheless-theres-something-i-dont-like-about-the-architecture-of-evolution-data-server#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/03/19/nonetheless-theres-something-i-dont-like-about-the-architecture-of-evolution-data-server#comment-580</guid>
		<description>I will personally review a patchset which adds a cursor based API to libedatabook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will personally review a patchset which adds a cursor based API to libedatabook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
