<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Almost very happy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/almost-very-happy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/almost-very-happy</link>
	<description>From the mind of Philip</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 12:59:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pvanhoof</title>
		<link>http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/almost-very-happy#comment-602</link>
		<dc:creator>pvanhoof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/almost-very-happy#comment-602</guid>
		<description>@Garoth: I tried the procedure to migrate the multi-file vmdk format of my VMWare to vdi files for VirtualBox. After hours of migration work I tried using the seemingly correctly (size was ok, and the all tools returned success too) created disk-file as harddisk in VirtualBox.

Upon boot it told me that there was a disk-sector error, and that I had to press ctrl+alt+del to reboot. I only have one disk in VMWare, although it&#039;s a multi-file vmdk. So the boot sector is on that disk.

So unless VirtualBox makes a tool for this that&#039;ll just always work, I&#039;m unlikely to migrate my Virtual Machines on VMWare to VirtualBox.

But sure it&#039;s cool that there&#039;s an opensource VM with a useful UI that does somewhat integrate correctly within my desktop (so unlike Xen, who are primarily targeted at servers. Which is something me, as a developer, has relatively few interest in).

So for now, I&#039;m going to keep using the software Christian is working on. Although commercial software, it&#039;s one of the few titles in the market that absolutely deserved my money. Simply because I get real value back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Garoth: I tried the procedure to migrate the multi-file vmdk format of my VMWare to vdi files for VirtualBox. After hours of migration work I tried using the seemingly correctly (size was ok, and the all tools returned success too) created disk-file as harddisk in VirtualBox.</p>
<p>Upon boot it told me that there was a disk-sector error, and that I had to press ctrl+alt+del to reboot. I only have one disk in VMWare, although it&#8217;s a multi-file vmdk. So the boot sector is on that disk.</p>
<p>So unless VirtualBox makes a tool for this that&#8217;ll just always work, I&#8217;m unlikely to migrate my Virtual Machines on VMWare to VirtualBox.</p>
<p>But sure it&#8217;s cool that there&#8217;s an opensource VM with a useful UI that does somewhat integrate correctly within my desktop (so unlike Xen, who are primarily targeted at servers. Which is something me, as a developer, has relatively few interest in).</p>
<p>So for now, I&#8217;m going to keep using the software Christian is working on. Although commercial software, it&#8217;s one of the few titles in the market that absolutely deserved my money. Simply because I get real value back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pvanhoof</title>
		<link>http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/almost-very-happy#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator>pvanhoof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/almost-very-happy#comment-604</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot for the tip, suka!

That helped a lot indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for the tip, suka!</p>
<p>That helped a lot indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suka</title>
		<link>http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/almost-very-happy#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>suka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/almost-very-happy#comment-603</guid>
		<description>@Philip: About debugging: Actually there is a way to disable it, they are just not telling ;) You just have to move lib/bin/vmware-vmx-debug away and make a symlink of the same name to the vmware-vmx file in the same directory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Philip: About debugging: Actually there is a way to disable it, they are just not telling ;) You just have to move lib/bin/vmware-vmx-debug away and make a symlink of the same name to the vmware-vmx file in the same directory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Hammond</title>
		<link>http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/almost-very-happy#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Hammond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 06:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/almost-very-happy#comment-606</guid>
		<description>Garoth: VMware Workstation has had multiple snapshots for many years now. We&#039;ve also had seamless support for a while in Fusion, it&#039;s just only recently moving into the Workstation product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Garoth: VMware Workstation has had multiple snapshots for many years now. We&#8217;ve also had seamless support for a while in Fusion, it&#8217;s just only recently moving into the Workstation product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garoth</title>
		<link>http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/almost-very-happy#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>Garoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 01:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/almost-very-happy#comment-595</guid>
		<description>Again, Virtualbox. It&#039;s even open source now. It does way more than the current VMWare for Linux does.

 - Multiple snapshots
 - Seamless support (the feature you&#039;re on about)
 - Seems faster</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, Virtualbox. It&#8217;s even open source now. It does way more than the current VMWare for Linux does.</p>
<p> &#8211; Multiple snapshots<br />
 &#8211; Seamless support (the feature you&#8217;re on about)<br />
 &#8211; Seems faster</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Paul</title>
		<link>http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/almost-very-happy#comment-598</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 23:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/almost-very-happy#comment-598</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m another former VMware server user who has switched to VirtualBox. It&#039;s better and it gives you this feature too, though admittedly with some of the same problems (it doesn&#039;t like multihead either).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m another former VMware server user who has switched to VirtualBox. It&#8217;s better and it gives you this feature too, though admittedly with some of the same problems (it doesn&#8217;t like multihead either).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimothyP</title>
		<link>http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/almost-very-happy#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>TimothyP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 22:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/almost-very-happy#comment-605</guid>
		<description>I use Fusion on Mac all the time.
Not because I  need Windows on a Mac, I&#039;ve got separate machines for that,
but because it&#039;s a great tool to test stuff. Including the Ubuntu Live CD images we deploy for a certain project.

Unity works great, and friends who&#039;ve recently transfered to Mac are using it
as well. Since they already have a non-oem licence for Windows it&#039;s a good solution.

We&#039;re going to deploy a Windows 2008 server soon, so we used Fusion to test our
applications on it. (Yes we have multiple Linux servers, so please don&#039;t burn me for
deploying Windows servers as well, I honestly couldn&#039;t care less about the whole OS flame wars)

If you&#039;re using multiple screens, it gets really nice. Simply put your other OS fullscreen on the second screen and it feels just like a normal computer.

Oh and fusion doesn&#039;t slow down my Mac :-)

VMWare workstation does offer great tools for developers,
currently unavailable in Fusion, but that&#039;s because both products
target a different audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Fusion on Mac all the time.<br />
Not because I  need Windows on a Mac, I&#8217;ve got separate machines for that,<br />
but because it&#8217;s a great tool to test stuff. Including the Ubuntu Live CD images we deploy for a certain project.</p>
<p>Unity works great, and friends who&#8217;ve recently transfered to Mac are using it<br />
as well. Since they already have a non-oem licence for Windows it&#8217;s a good solution.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re going to deploy a Windows 2008 server soon, so we used Fusion to test our<br />
applications on it. (Yes we have multiple Linux servers, so please don&#8217;t burn me for<br />
deploying Windows servers as well, I honestly couldn&#8217;t care less about the whole OS flame wars)</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re using multiple screens, it gets really nice. Simply put your other OS fullscreen on the second screen and it feels just like a normal computer.</p>
<p>Oh and fusion doesn&#8217;t slow down my Mac :-)</p>
<p>VMWare workstation does offer great tools for developers,<br />
currently unavailable in Fusion, but that&#8217;s because both products<br />
target a different audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Hammond</title>
		<link>http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/almost-very-happy#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Hammond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 20:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/almost-very-happy#comment-601</guid>
		<description>Sorry you hit these problems. It does happen on Metacity at times due to the focus stealing prevention, though I had thought these issues were fixed. I&#039;ll look into it further and try to reproduce it. What version of Metacity are you running?

The issue of moving onto a second screen will go away when we add multi-head support. The shifting issue will also go away.

Beta 1 is certainly not perfect. Consider it more of a technology preview. It&#039;ll rock by the time we finish up the release though :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry you hit these problems. It does happen on Metacity at times due to the focus stealing prevention, though I had thought these issues were fixed. I&#8217;ll look into it further and try to reproduce it. What version of Metacity are you running?</p>
<p>The issue of moving onto a second screen will go away when we add multi-head support. The shifting issue will also go away.</p>
<p>Beta 1 is certainly not perfect. Consider it more of a technology preview. It&#8217;ll rock by the time we finish up the release though :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bronson</title>
		<link>http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/almost-very-happy#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>bronson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 20:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/almost-very-happy#comment-600</guid>
		<description>http://ubuntu-tutorials.com/2008/02/01/how-to-do-seamless-window-integration-with-ubuntu-virtualbox/

I haven&#039;t tried it yet but it definitely looks easier than hassling with VMWare.  (awful license issues)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ubuntu-tutorials.com/2008/02/01/how-to-do-seamless-window-integration-with-ubuntu-virtualbox/" rel="nofollow">http://ubuntu-tutorials.com/2008/02/01/how-to-do-seamless-window-integration-with-ubuntu-virtualbox/</a></p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t tried it yet but it definitely looks easier than hassling with VMWare.  (awful license issues)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meneer R</title>
		<link>http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/almost-very-happy#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>Meneer R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/almost-very-happy#comment-599</guid>
		<description>VMWare is a pig. Use openbox instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VMWare is a pig. Use openbox instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remm</title>
		<link>http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/almost-very-happy#comment-597</link>
		<dc:creator>Remm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/almost-very-happy#comment-597</guid>
		<description>I am not very happy with the whole concept of having to maintain two OSes (costs time and money, so I doubt any company will choose that as a real desktop solution). As I suppose it would be a more cost effective solution, how does Wine compare overall right now for running these few desktop apps ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not very happy with the whole concept of having to maintain two OSes (costs time and money, so I doubt any company will choose that as a real desktop solution). As I suppose it would be a more cost effective solution, how does Wine compare overall right now for running these few desktop apps ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bapt</title>
		<link>http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/almost-very-happy#comment-596</link>
		<dc:creator>bapt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2008/04/03/almost-very-happy#comment-596</guid>
		<description>If you had use the opensource virtualbox, you would have notice the seamless mode which allow you to do this for quite some time now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you had use the opensource virtualbox, you would have notice the seamless mode which allow you to do this for quite some time now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

