But… I… I’m so confused now.

I am saying that although I do I feel responsible for my own blog’s content, I don’t feel responsible for GNOME’s reputation through its planet’s content. For that, the planet has a maintainer instead.

I trust this person’s capacity to be responsible. I don’t need to babysit this individual, at all. In fact would it be condescending to babysit this person.

I said audience has a responsibility to decide for themselves whether or not the ideas that appear on a website (like my blog) are either true, false, idiot, genius, acceptable, immoral, etc. I said that planet maintainers are themselves responsible for deciding what type of content is and what type of content isn’t acceptable for the website which they maintain.

I say that audience has the capacity to understand intent and that audience, if it wants to be relevant audience, needs to utilize this capacity.

Whereas I’m fine with disagreeable x, as long as the author is making a good case for it. Once their case becomes idiotic, I start thinking “get off my Planet!”