<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tracker experimental merged to main development tree, Ivan&#8217;s presentation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2009/07/02/tracker-experimental-merged-to-main-development-tree-ivans-presentation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2009/07/02/tracker-experimental-merged-to-main-development-tree-ivans-presentation</link>
	<description>From the mind of Philip</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 12:59:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pvanhoof</title>
		<link>http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2009/07/02/tracker-experimental-merged-to-main-development-tree-ivans-presentation#comment-1154</link>
		<dc:creator>pvanhoof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 10:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2009/07/02/tracker-experimental-merged-to-main-development-tree-ivans-presentation#comment-1154</guid>
		<description>@Robert McQueen: I think it&#039;s important for me to point out that we&#039;re not planning to switch to another IPC. The unix-socket one is just experimental and if it would ever be used, then it would only be for SPARQL-Update (not query).

We&#039;re also very interested in improving DBus itself, instead. We of course want to avoid having to implement our own IPC stuff (but note that the experimental ipc thingy is fairly simple in both code and purpose, you can find it at tracker-store-ipc branch btw).

Anyway, right now the experiment is more for testing than serious purposes. Don&#039;t worry too much, we&#039;re not stupid enough to actively want to implement our own IPC :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Robert McQueen: I think it&#8217;s important for me to point out that we&#8217;re not planning to switch to another IPC. The unix-socket one is just experimental and if it would ever be used, then it would only be for SPARQL-Update (not query).</p>
<p>We&#8217;re also very interested in improving DBus itself, instead. We of course want to avoid having to implement our own IPC stuff (but note that the experimental ipc thingy is fairly simple in both code and purpose, you can find it at tracker-store-ipc branch btw).</p>
<p>Anyway, right now the experiment is more for testing than serious purposes. Don&#8217;t worry too much, we&#8217;re not stupid enough to actively want to implement our own IPC :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert McQueen</title>
		<link>http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2009/07/02/tracker-experimental-merged-to-main-development-tree-ivans-presentation#comment-1155</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert McQueen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pvanhoof.be/blog/index.php/2009/07/02/tracker-experimental-merged-to-main-development-tree-ivans-presentation#comment-1155</guid>
		<description>Would it be possible to look at enhancing the performance of D-Bus in your use-cases, rather than having to write a new IPC system? That makes me very sad... :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would it be possible to look at enhancing the performance of D-Bus in your use-cases, rather than having to write a new IPC system? That makes me very sad&#8230; :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

